Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardizing implementation input/output #856

Open
stormofice opened this issue Sep 3, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Standardizing implementation input/output #856

stormofice opened this issue Sep 3, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@stormofice
Copy link
Contributor

stormofice commented Sep 3, 2021

Description

This issue is meant to be an overview on which chapters need their input or output to be standardized.

Why

Why this needs to be done is outlined in #824, but other relevant issues include #625, #558 and #320.

Overview

Chapter PR Status
Verlet Integration #855 #873 Merged
Tree Traversal #857 Merged
Euclidean Algorithm #877 Blocked [Missing langs]
Monte Carlo Integration - Needs standardization
Gaussian Elimination - Needs standardization
Thomas Algorithm - Needs standardization
Jarvis March - Needs standardization
Graham Scan - Needs standardization
FFT - Needs standardization
Stable Marriage Problem - Needs standardization
Forward Euler Method - Needs standardization
Split-Operator Method - Needs standardization
Huffman Encoding - Needs standardization
Flood Fill - Needs standardization
Computus - Needs standardization
Approximate Counting Algorithm #913 Merged
Stacks and Queues - Needs standardization
@leios leios added the General label Sep 3, 2021
@leios
Copy link
Member

leios commented Sep 3, 2021

I think (of the methods mentioned here), computus should be relatively easy. I think the only difference between implementations is the number of tabs in the output. Some people wanted 1 tab, others wanted 2 (and it depended on their tabwidth set in their terminal emulator).

@ShadowMitia
Copy link
Contributor

I suggest we add stack and queue to the list as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants