Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About multiple observations (multiple measurements) in History Matching #144

Open
RyuichiKANAI opened this issue Nov 27, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@RyuichiKANAI
Copy link

Current History Matching code can implement a single observation case.
In the case of the multiple observations, or multiple measurements, implementing single observation History Matching can provide plausible parameter space respectively and compare those results.
However, in the case of multiple measurements, using all the data can give different results compared to a single measurement case.

I attached the example pictures.
In this case, the model is just a linear line expressed as y = theta*x.
Using two measurements together should give a different estimated model with an estimated parameter, which is described in the third picture.
This result should be different from the result using a single measurement twice, which is described in the first and the second pictures.

Is there any specific plan to implement History matching using multiple measurements?

20201127_presentation_1
20201127_presentation_2
20201127_presentation_3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant