Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Re-assess firewall rules #1807

Closed
5 tasks done
jemrobinson opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
5 tasks done

Re-assess firewall rules #1807

jemrobinson opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New functionality that should be added to the Safe Haven
Milestone
Release 5.0.0rc2

Comments

@jemrobinson
Copy link
Member

jemrobinson commented Apr 15, 2024 •
edited

✅ Checklist

  • I have searched open and closed issues for duplicates.
  • This is a request for a new feature in the Data Safe Haven or an upgrade to an existing feature.
  • The feature is still missing in the latest version.
  • I have read through the documentation.
  • This isn't an open-ended question (open a discussion if it is).

🍓 Suggested change

We should ensure that our firewall rules are appropriate for the resources deployed in the Python/Pulumi design. Especially the shm-<name>-all rule, which applies to all resources.

🚂 How could this be done?

Co-working/discussion on firewall rules.
@jemrobinson jemrobinson added the enhancement New functionality that should be added to the Safe Haven label Apr 15, 2024
@jemrobinson jemrobinson added this to the Release 5.0.0rc2 milestone Apr 15, 2024
@JimMadge
Copy link
Member

Done in #1872 #1883

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New functionality that should be added to the Safe Haven
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Release 5.0.0rc2
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jemrobinson @JimMadge