Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Paper: Utility vs Privacy (DP and e.g. Disclosure Risk) #123

Open
ots22 opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Paper: Utility vs Privacy (DP and e.g. Disclosure Risk) #123

ots22 opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
paper Papers we are planning to write ourselves

Comments

@ots22
Copy link
Member

ots22 commented Nov 5, 2020

Write a paper or technical report that compares differentially-private synthesis methods for their utility, as the privacy parameter (epsilon) varies.

  • identify suitable synthesis methods (based on literature review of those offering DP)
  • decide on a variety of input datasets covering the problems we are interested in, and corresponding parameters for them
  • decide on the measures of utility (problem/dataset dependent)
  • could also compute the Disclosure Risk score for the syntheses (since it depends only on input and output data)
  • produce some figures of utility vs privacy (e.g. like those in the discussion on Experiments: utility vs privacy (as measured by disclosure risk) #120)
  • capture any new methods and the workflow for the figures in QUIPP-pipeline, as well as the run inputs used to generate the results (for reproducibility and to allow extension to other methods, or refinement of existing methods)
@ots22
Copy link
Member Author

ots22 commented Nov 5, 2020

Check this idea with a DP expert first, to make sure the comparisons we want to make are sensible.

@ots22 ots22 added the paper Papers we are planning to write ourselves label Nov 18, 2020
@gmingas
Copy link
Contributor

gmingas commented Nov 24, 2020

This working paper is related to what we are proposing here, focusing on DP-GANs only.

@ots22
Copy link
Member Author

ots22 commented Nov 24, 2020

Good find!

@gmingas
Copy link
Contributor

gmingas commented Nov 24, 2020

It was suggested by Giovanni Cherubin during the synthetic data meeting Kasra and I had earlier today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
paper Papers we are planning to write ourselves
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants