Old emacs-module.h vs using one from an Emacs installation

[manphiz]

It looks like emacs-module.h was copied from the Emacs source tree 6 years ago. I wonder whether this file was kept from being updated so as to be compatible with older Emacs versions?

Meanwhile, is it desirable to let emacs-libvterm detect an existing Emacs installation and use the emacs-module.h from that if available?

[Sbozzolo]

Is there anything you would like to have from more recent versions?

[manphiz]

Gabriele Bozzola ***@***.***> writes:

Is there anything you would like to have from more recent versions?

Nothing in particular right now, as it seems emacs-module.h has been kept mostly forward-compatible. Here[1] is a list of changes to emacs-module.h.in in Emacs source through the years, which are not many actually. I think [2] could be the most prominent change, though different ***@***.***_major_version@ versions may be kept of a compatible ABI layout most of the time. For now. Anyway, my question is more about whether it is desirable to provide an option to use emacs-module.h from an existing Emacs installation so as to ensure maximum compatibility, as well as to avoid accidental breakage just in case. This may be more of interest for packaging in a Linux distribution (e.g. Debian, which is patched to use the one from its Emacs installation[3]) compared to distributing through ELPA. [1] https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/commits/master/src/emacs-module.h.in?before=ce8e292bca84f29cea540e3e23e88ec7a5d1674e+35 [2] emacs-mirror/emacs@232a36f [3] https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/emacs-libvterm/-/blob/debian/master/debian/patches/use-system-emacs-module.h.patch?ref_type=heads -- Xiyue Deng