DXE-3681 SECKSD-25367 Terraform import match_target - Error : Value not found: match_target

[benbrd]

terraform import match_target issue causing duplicate match_target resources created in security configuration as the previous one is not sync with the tfstate file.
This is a blocker for our customers trying to manage their security configuration as code.

Terraform Version

$ terraform -v Terraform v1.8.1 on linux_amd64

Affected Resource(s)

terraform import akamai_appsec_match_target

Debug Output

module.security.akamai_appsec_match_target.website_7863884: Importing from ID "101079:7863884"...
module.security.akamai_appsec_match_target.website_7863884: Import prepared!
  Prepared akamai_appsec_match_target for import
module.security.akamai_appsec_match_target.website_7863884: Refreshing state... [id=101079:7863884]
╷
│ Error: value not found: match_target
│
│
╵

Expected Behavior

Import successful!

Actual Behavior

Error: value not found: match_target

Steps to Reproduce

1. Use Akamai CLI to export an existing security configuration with command akamai terraform export-appsec <config_name>
2. Run sh ./appsec-import.sh to start importing the configuration into the local Terraform state.

[benbrd]

After some testing on my side it appears that when forcing with v5.5.0 of the provider, the import is successful :

$ terraform import module.security.akamai_appsec_match_target.website_7863884 101079:7863884
module.security.data.akamai_group.group: Reading...
module.security.data.akamai_group.group: Read complete after 1s [id=grp_215942]
module.security.akamai_appsec_match_target.website_7863884: Importing from ID "101079:7863884"...
module.security.akamai_appsec_match_target.website_7863884: Import prepared!
  Prepared akamai_appsec_match_target for import
module.security.akamai_appsec_match_target.website_7863884: Refreshing state... [id=101079:7863884]

Import successful!

The resources that were imported are shown above. These resources are now in
your Terraform state and will henceforth be managed by Terraform.

[lsadlon]

Hi @benbrd

So it works for you with v5.5.0 version of provider, but is still failing with newer ones?

BR,
Lukasz