You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Today, we went through the XPS example from the docs (PA molecule) and also tried one example from the user's system (Al2O3 bulk).
Both cases agree well with the experimental data.
Some feedback on the improvement:
explain the band gap correction for the insulator.
for example, Al2O3, the DFT calculated binding energy 77.8 eV, the experimental band gap ~ 7 eV, and the experimental spin-orbit splitting is 0.4 eV, so for the Al 2P 3/2,
77.8-7/2-0.4/3=74.2eV
experimental data is around 74.1 eV.
When uploading the experimental data, explain the data format in more detail. e.g., csv file, and delete the title.
support charge analysis
Charge density with and without core-hole
Bader charge with and without core-hole
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Today, we went through the XPS example from the docs (PA molecule) and also tried one example from the user's system (Al2O3 bulk).
Both cases agree well with the experimental data.
Some feedback on the improvement:
for example, Al2O3, the DFT calculated binding energy 77.8 eV, the experimental band gap ~ 7 eV, and the experimental spin-orbit splitting is 0.4 eV, so for the Al 2P 3/2,
experimental data is around 74.1 eV.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: