Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some Problems on Reproducing the Results on cub200 #19

Open
yuesongtian opened this issue Aug 20, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Some Problems on Reproducing the Results on cub200 #19

yuesongtian opened this issue Aug 20, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@yuesongtian
Copy link

Hi, I want to train antialias-cnn on cub200 dataset. I use ResNet-50 backbone.

However, I do not see increase of accuracy with BlurPool after several experiments. Do you have any suggestions for antialias-cnn on fine-grained datasets (e.g. cub200)?

Thank you.

Expected Behaviour

Actual Behaviour

Reproduce Scenario (including but not limited to)

Steps to Reproduce

Platform and Version

Sample Code that illustrates the problem

Logs taken while reproducing problem

@richzhang
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for experimenting on this! Not really a "reproduction" problem, as we didn't have these results in the paper.

Accuracy may go up or down for different datasets. The shift-invariance should be improved more reliably!

@zhangchbin
Copy link

Hi, I want to train antialias-cnn on cub200 dataset. I use ResNet-50 backbone.

However, I do not see increase of accuracy with BlurPool after several experiments. Do you have any suggestions for antialias-cnn on fine-grained datasets (e.g. cub200)?

Thank you.

Expected Behaviour

Actual Behaviour

Reproduce Scenario (including but not limited to)

Steps to Reproduce

Platform and Version

Sample Code that illustrates the problem

Logs taken while reproducing problem

Can you post the performance on the CUB200?
Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants