Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No License File #9

Open
adagio256 opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 10 comments
Open

No License File #9

adagio256 opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@adagio256
Copy link

Repositories with sharable content should contain licenses.

@eljamm
Copy link

eljamm commented May 15, 2024

@adagio256
Copy link
Author

@eljamm
Copy link

eljamm commented May 15, 2024

I'm not a lawyer, but isn't the link you've posted about:

Using copyrighted material in your teaching

While what we're talking about here is a license for the project in general?

@adagio256
Copy link
Author

I am more-so wondering about how to license derivative works I may want to publish as my own.

@adagio256
Copy link
Author

adagio256 commented May 15, 2024

If the authors have a license preference I would respect that otherwise closing the question since it's all non-commercial for learning purposes.

@eljamm
Copy link

eljamm commented May 15, 2024

We still haven't heard the author's opinion on this, though.

@ad-si May we discuss adding a license to the project?

@adagio256 adagio256 reopened this May 15, 2024
@ad-si
Copy link
Owner

ad-si commented May 15, 2024

Sorry for being absent from the discussion. I’d like to add a license as well, but I’m not sure since a lot is copied from the book and other anki decks.

@adagio256
Copy link
Author

I'm not a lawyer here. I see the reuse of content as clearly non-commercial fair-use. Perhaps a permissive non-commercial share-and-share alike creative-commons license would provide an indication to that effect?

@eljamm
Copy link

eljamm commented May 15, 2024

Once again, I'm not a lawyer, but as far as the rust-book is concerned, I think it's alright to use it since it's dual-licensed under MIT and Apache-2.0.

As for the other Anki decks. Perhaps we can contact their authors and ask if it's alright if their work is included? This might also depend on how much of their work is indluded.

Whatever we do, though. I think it's far better to add a license than not to, since the project is already up and the code is available anyways.

@adagio256
Copy link
Author

adagio256 commented May 15, 2024

For the code portions, I'm not a lawyer, but I do think copying the license files and generally indicating which parts are covered should be done. I don't see how there is any clearly fair use of technical components even if the project is non-commercial etc.

Maybe I, as not a lawyer, wouldn't worry about the cards content except to perhaps add something to the effect of it being shared as non-commercial.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants