Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Auto save for images #32

Open
tanmaypandey7 opened this issue Feb 22, 2019 · 9 comments
Open

Feature request: Auto save for images #32

tanmaypandey7 opened this issue Feb 22, 2019 · 9 comments

Comments

@tanmaypandey7
Copy link

tanmaypandey7 commented Feb 22, 2019

Auto save will be very helpful for fast annotations.
Also, maybe not keep a cap on the circular brush? I am annotating very high size images (about 4k) and the brush feels small even at its maximum size.

@tanmaypandey7 tanmaypandey7 changed the title Feature request: Auto save and remove new tabs for images Feature request: Auto save for images Feb 22, 2019
@abreheret
Copy link
Owner

There are already practical shortcuts :

  • CTRL + S to save the current image
  • CTRL + W close the current image

@tanmaypandey7
Copy link
Author

tanmaypandey7 commented Feb 22, 2019

Yes, I know but when I have about 300 images to annotate it becomes cumbersome to keep pressing ctrl+s every time

@tanmaypandey7
Copy link
Author

screenshot 32
Screenshot for an image I am annotating right now. Brush is a little small for this.

@abreheret
Copy link
Owner

It's better than nothing :D (for the shortcuts)

You do not have to open all the images at the same time, and as soon as you have finished an image you can save it and close it, then make the following image.

I leave open this issue, if one day I have time to add this feature ...

@tanmaypandey7
Copy link
Author

Okay, can anything be done for the brush size?
Thank you for fast reply

@abreheret
Copy link
Owner

What is the problem with the 'brush size' ?
You can change the size with the 'Circle size' under the 'Resize factor'

@tanmaypandey7
Copy link
Author

Yes, the maximum size "99" is a bit small for high dimensional images

@abreheret
Copy link
Owner

Which max size do you think is correct ? 300 ?

@tanmaypandey7
Copy link
Author

Apologies sir, I was using the watershed incorrectly. Instead of labelling just the borders of the target, I was coloring the entire region of interest. It is working as it is, sorry for the trouble.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants