Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lattice parameter wrong by 8% with FR PBEsol for KTaO3 #111

Open
bretzel15 opened this issue Nov 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Lattice parameter wrong by 8% with FR PBEsol for KTaO3 #111

bretzel15 opened this issue Nov 15, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@bretzel15
Copy link

Dear pseudo-dojo people,

thank you very much for your work here! I just found one problem with one of the pps from your project:

The PBE pseudopotentials for K, Ta and O seem to be fine for lattice parameter calculations, but trying the PBEsol versions, I found out that the FR pps minimize the energy at a lattice parameter of around 4.3 A, which is almost 8% off the experimental one of 3.9885 A (see attached figure showing the total energy difference versus different lattice parameters), calculated with QE 6.3.

Calculations with the SR PBEsol pps end up at 3.977 A, while both PBE pps end up around 4.02 A (see attached images, which is in reasonable agreement with the experimental one.

Do you maybe know why the FR PBEsol are off that far? Is this a known problem?

Best,
Tobias


PBEsol FR with problems
image


PBEsol SR
image


PBE FR
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant