You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
List of the 990 accessions where there's possibly a new CoV/nido RdRp according to sra_species_table.tsv: s3://serratus-rayan/pro_new_cov_nido-assembly/all_new_cov_nido.sra
An immediate take-away is that most of the checkv_filtered assemblies are empty. So I recommend not using them but instead take gene_clusters.fasta or to be even more conservative, the whole scaffolds.fasta.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
List of the 990 accessions where there's possibly a new CoV/nido RdRp according to
sra_species_table.tsv
:s3://serratus-rayan/pro_new_cov_nido-assembly/all_new_cov_nido.sra
900 could be assembled, here are the:
scaffolds.fasta
(900) :s3://serratus-rayan/pro_new_cov_nido-assembly/all_new_cov_nido.scaffolds.txt
gene_clusters.fasta
(900) :s3://serratus-rayan/pro_new_cov_nido-assembly/all_new_cov_nido.gc.txt
gene_clusters.checkv_filtered.fasta
(898):s3://serratus-rayan/pro_new_cov_nido-assembly/all_new_cov_nido.gc_cv
An immediate take-away is that most of the
checkv_filtered
assemblies are empty. So I recommend not using them but instead takegene_clusters.fasta
or to be even more conservative, the wholescaffolds.fasta
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: