Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LP calls instead of MIP calls #174

Open
4 tasks
dhendryc opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks

LP calls instead of MIP calls #174

dhendryc opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@dhendryc
Copy link
Collaborator

It can be more useful in some cases to solve the LP in Frank-Wolfe not the MIP (see Network Design Problem).
We currently rely a lot on the fact that the vertices are integer feasible. So this will probably require quite a bit work.

Ideally, we simply create a new Node type and implement the branching and evaluation functions for this (i.e. we will have a new file, e.g. called node_lp.jl).

  • Check where we implicitly or explicitly rely on the integrality of vertices.
  • Does the solve function rely on that? If yes, how do we best avoid copy-pasting and having duplicate code?
  • Does the strong convexity and global/dual tightening work out of the box?
  • Adapt strong branching.
@dhendryc dhendryc added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Jan 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant