Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request Advanced Enchantments add in AutoLibrarian #973

Open
4 tasks
D0rothy47 opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks

Request Advanced Enchantments add in AutoLibrarian #973

D0rothy47 opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@D0rothy47
Copy link

Pre-suggestion checklist

  • I have searched existing issues and didn't find any previous issues with the same suggestion.
  • This is only one suggestion. I understand that GitHub issues don't work well with lists.
  • This feature doesn't already exist in the latest version of Wurst. I've made sure my installation is up to date.
  • I have looked at the code and am reasonably confident that this suggestion is possible to implement.

What type of improvement are you suggesting?

Adding a new hack., Adding a different kind of feature.

What type of player would find this improvement useful?

PVPers, Anarchy/faction players

Description

Hi ! can you add more enchantment form advancedenchantments plugin in to autolibrarian hack please?

@D0rothy47 D0rothy47 added status:unconfirmed New issue. Needs triage. type:enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 27, 2024
@Alexander01998
Copy link
Member

Hey @D0rothy47!

Thanks for the suggestion. I've taken a look at the AdvancedEnchantments plugin and I see what you're after.

The thing is, this plugin creates fake enchantments by modifying the lore text of items, and in addition all of the enchantment names are customizable. This makes it difficult to identify the fake enchantments and tell them apart from regular lore text.

Because of this, adding support for the AdvancedEnchantments plugin to AutoLibrarian might not be feasible.

Copy link

This issue has been open for a while with no recent activity. If this issue is still important to you, please add a comment within the next 7 days to keep it open. Otherwise, the issue will be automatically closed to free up time for other tasks.

Issues should be closed if:

  • They are duplicates of other issues
  • There is not enough demand
  • They are no longer relevant
  • There are not enough details

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants