Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only 250 images are loaded #492

Open
ronbruins opened this issue Sep 15, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Only 250 images are loaded #492

ronbruins opened this issue Sep 15, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@ronbruins
Copy link

When opening a folder with a large amount (>250) it shows 250 images and spinning circle, like it is loading the remaining ones.

@ronbruins
Copy link
Author

I have tested it some more and some unexpected behaviour presented itself, however is a workaround by itself :-)

When the thumbs are smallest
Screenshot 2023-09-15 at 12 54 51 Medium
It gets stuck at 250 and a spinning circle...

When changing the size that needs to scroll and scrolling down, it will load the additional images. Then returning to the small thumb page it shows all images:

Screenshot 2023-09-15 at 12 57 09 Medium

@Webreaper
Copy link
Owner

It's implemented as virtual scrolling. The way it should work is that when you scroll the last image on-screen, the next lot should load.
Is your screen so big that all 250 load and fit on screen? If you make the browser smaller does the scrolling then work?

It might be I need to tweak so that if you're on a huge monitor, it auto-loads more if the last image is already visible in the viewport.

@ronbruins
Copy link
Author

ronbruins commented Sep 15, 2023 via email

@Webreaper
Copy link
Owner

Okay, thanks. Looks like I need to buy a bigger screen 'for testing'. ;)

Will look at putting in a fix. :)

@Webreaper
Copy link
Owner

Okay, long time coming, but I think I have a fix for this.... to try it you'll need to pull webreaper/damselfly:dev - and you may need to shift-refresh your browser to ensure the latest javascript loads. Let me know if it does the trick.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants