Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display Vendor Specific Information Elements as possible since API Level 30 #367

Open
codingcatgirl opened this issue Jan 29, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@codingcatgirl
Copy link

It would be nice if the App displayed the vendor specific IEEE 802.11 information elements that were found in the WiFi Beacons. Android's API Level 30 introduced ScanResult.getInformationElements(), which can be used to query this information.

@VREMSoftwareDevelopment
Copy link
Owner

Please use provided feature report template, do not forget to fill all required information in the template. The information provided in the template helps to resolve issues faster.

All current contributors are busy with other work. When we don't have an opportunity or time to implement a feature, we encourage developers to fork the project and become a contributor. It would be great to add new contributors to this project.

@codingcatgirl
Copy link
Author

I have looked at the issue template. There is no required information in the template that makes sense to answer for this kind of feature request: It asks whether the feature request is related to a problem (it's not), what solution i'd like (i have described it), alternatives i've considered (there are none), how i can help (i probably can't), additional context (there is none), and Device/Android information (irrelevant for a feature request). That's why i didn't use the template.

Thanks for the encouragement to submit a pull request. Maybe i will, though probably not soon.

@olekstomek
Copy link

I think it is related to #365

@codingcatgirl
Copy link
Author

codingcatgirl commented May 25, 2022

@olekstomek nah, vendor specific information is something completely different :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants