Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement][Core] Improve output image labels #71

Open
Udayraj123 opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 8 comments
Open

[Enhancement][Core] Improve output image labels #71

Udayraj123 opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@Udayraj123
Copy link
Owner

This is an enhancement version of #42

Steps

  1. Follow Readme to setup and run OMRChecker
  2. Set show_image_level = 4 or 5
  3. Run OMRChecker on sample images
  4. For each image that you see, try to add appropriate labels to each output image using cv2.putText, etc so that they are more understandable. For any queries discuss in discord.
  5. You can create them in separate PRs if needed.

Note: this issue is marked with the hacktoberfest label. Follow #hacktoberfest-discussions on Discord for further details .

@ig77ayush
Copy link

Please assign this issue to me

@Udayraj123
Copy link
Owner Author

Can you discuss the approach on discord before getting assigned?

@Udayraj123
Copy link
Owner Author

@ig77ayush let me know if you still want to work on it

@aayushibansal2001
Copy link

I want to work on this issue. Please assign it to me.

@Udayraj123
Copy link
Owner Author

@aayushibansal2001 sure, adding link to block diagrams here as well: https://github.com/Udayraj123/OMRChecker/wiki/Diagrams#block-diagrams

@Udayraj123
Copy link
Owner Author

@aayushibansal2001 let me know if you have worked at some extent on this issue.

@Gauravmauryaios
Copy link

Please assign this issue to me

@Udayraj123
Copy link
Owner Author

@Gauravmauryaios let's get on discord and discuss 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants