Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider adding EPA CAMPD facility inventory #158

Open
dt-woods opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Consider adding EPA CAMPD facility inventory #158

dt-woods opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@dt-woods
Copy link

As described in USEPA/ElectricityLCI#207, annual facility-level emissions from EPA's Clean Air Markets Program Data are desired for building a life cycle inventory for U.S. electricity generation. The EPA provide a web-based portal (here) and an API to access this data. A method, build_cems_df is available to query the API for all the state-based facility-level annual emissions, here, which requires a user to register for an API key (here). For harmonization with other facility-level data, it would be nice to have this a part of StEWI.

@bl-young
Copy link
Collaborator

is the json here: USEPA/ElectricityLCI#207 (comment) a pretty accurate estimate of what you anticipate the ultimate data looking like? If so, it would be quite similar to our eGRID facility data.

@bl-young
Copy link
Collaborator

Seems like a reasonable candidate, I'll ask @WesIngwersen to chime in.

@WesIngwersen
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, that one has been on the radar for awhile. Not something our team can support immediately except through connection with the Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) data team to discuss the ideal approach (also might be a more ideal way to update eGRID). Please email with further planning inquiries/plans.

@dt-woods
Copy link
Author

is the json here: USEPA/ElectricityLCI#207 (comment) a pretty accurate estimate of what you anticipate the ultimate data looking like? If so, it would be quite similar to our eGRID facility data.

Yes. That's the data format we're working with.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants