You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Poly2 parabolic responses that look like an inverted U shape capture the model top as the top of the data points and not the top of the model curve. Is this intentional? I can’t remember from our discussions on the new poly2.
Here’s an example.
You can see other models would have similar tops to what is actually given, but the poly2 has this “tail” up that doesn’t get captured by the top. It’s not bad to just have the top be the top of the responses – but I wondered overall for tcpl what makes sense here to be consistent with how we fit and call the theoretical top.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Poly2 parabolic responses that look like an inverted U shape capture the model top as the top of the data points and not the top of the model curve. Is this intentional? I can’t remember from our discussions on the new poly2.
Here’s an example.
You can see other models would have similar tops to what is actually given, but the poly2 has this “tail” up that doesn’t get captured by the top. It’s not bad to just have the top be the top of the responses – but I wondered overall for tcpl what makes sense here to be consistent with how we fit and call the theoretical top.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: