Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JOSS review] Add a more realistic example #18

Open
mllg opened this issue Jun 17, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

[JOSS review] Add a more realistic example #18

mllg opened this issue Jun 17, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mllg
Copy link

mllg commented Jun 17, 2019

This is a part of the JOSS review outlined in openjournals/joss-reviews#1493.

It would be very important for the user to have a vignette with a more realistic example, especially on how to deal with failed jobs (retrieve logs, run job interactively to generate a traceback (is this possible?), re-submit subset of failed jobs).

@gvegayon gvegayon self-assigned this Jun 25, 2019
@gvegayon gvegayon added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 25, 2019
@gvegayon
Copy link
Member

Traceback is somewhat possible (on the horizon). Right now you can set up debug mode which tells sbatch to submit jobs using sh instead of sbatch, hence you can run the thing on your machine and inspect the log-files afterward. Perhaps, as you suggest, I could try to run the thing interactively instead with a tryCatch.

This sounds like a good thing to have (the example itself). I'll work on this for the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants