Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a way to express proxy connections #15

Open
Skyr opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Add a way to express proxy connections #15

Skyr opened this issue Apr 12, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Skyr
Copy link

Skyr commented Apr 12, 2021

It would be great to show communication links passing through proxies - e.g. by adding a "via" field (or even list) to the communication_links entries.

@cschneider4711
Copy link
Member

Yep, that's something useful for reverse proxies or stuff like that...

There's already something like that in the queue to have a technical component act like a transparent element in risk analysis. Ideas exist for being able to have "n" incoming communication links to a reverse-proxy (or WAF) like thing and then "m" connections outgoing but still being able to address what input leads to what specific output connection.

Current state is: haven't fully thought through about how to add this seamless and intuitively (for the user) to the model, but will post some ideas soon (currently prepping a conference talk about Threagile) and look forward for feedback then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants