Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add OpenWRT package #113

Open
rvolosatovs opened this issue Feb 7, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Add OpenWRT package #113

rvolosatovs opened this issue Feb 7, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@rvolosatovs
Copy link
Contributor

rvolosatovs commented Feb 7, 2019

Summary:

Package TTN stack and CLI for OpenWRT.
References #86

Why do we need this?

To make users happy

What is already there? What do you see now?

Binary releases

What is missing? What do you want to see?

OpenWRT package.

How do you propose to implement this?

Looks like goreleaser does not have support for it, but we can maybe add it?
Brew tap in https://github.com/TheThingsNetwork/homebrew-lorawan-stack should serve as an example of how the package should look like.

Environment:

CI

@rvolosatovs rvolosatovs added this to the Backlog milestone Feb 7, 2019
@rvolosatovs rvolosatovs added the ux label Feb 7, 2019
@johanstokking johanstokking added documentation This involves writing user documentation and removed ux labels Feb 7, 2019
@htdvisser htdvisser added release and removed documentation This involves writing user documentation labels Oct 10, 2019
@htdvisser htdvisser added needs/triage We still need to triage this and removed help wanted release labels Mar 26, 2021
@htdvisser htdvisser removed this from the Backlog milestone Mar 26, 2021
@htdvisser
Copy link
Contributor

Is there any demand for this? Otherwise I think we should just close this.

@rvolosatovs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Same reasoning as in all the other ones in this series.

If I have a device using OpenWRT and I get to choose a LoRaWAN stack to put there, I am going to choose the one already available in the package repository.

@htdvisser
Copy link
Contributor

As just discussed, we'll keep the issue open, but don't work on it unless it gets some upvotes.

@htdvisser htdvisser removed the needs/triage We still need to triage this label Mar 30, 2021
@vigalent
Copy link

I think some users may want to install the stack on their gateway in order to create a on premise / private service and pass data to other services.

@meckiemac
Copy link

I think some users may want to install the stack on their gateway in order to create a on premise / private service and pass data to other services.

Yes right and I have an example: What I currently do is copy manually the temporary keys (NwkSkey & AppSKey) out of TTN and put them into the ABP encryption to use the data also locally forwarded to an MQTT Server. Would be nice to automate this locally on the gateway.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants