You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, graphix does not assume arbitrary initial state for the MBQC. This is not a problem (still universal, just like real quantum hardware) but it would be a good feature to have, to test out MBQC with small toy models
Describe the feature you'd like
An option to simulate with arbitrary input state. For this, we would need:
an option to keep the input nodes during the Pattern.perform_pauli_measurements(). Otherwise input nodes will be considered fixed |+> states and be preprocessed, making it difficult to simulate with arbitrary input state.
an option to use arbitrary input statevector in StatevectorBackend.
similar option for TN backend.
Additional context
na
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, graphix does not assume arbitrary initial state for the MBQC. This is not a problem (still universal, just like real quantum hardware) but it would be a good feature to have, to test out MBQC with small toy models
Describe the feature you'd like
An option to simulate with arbitrary input state. For this, we would need:
Pattern.perform_pauli_measurements()
. Otherwise input nodes will be considered fixed|+>
states and be preprocessed, making it difficult to simulate with arbitrary input state.StatevectorBackend
.Additional context
na
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: