Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stronger binding to spatial relationships #114

Open
SteveMacenski opened this issue Feb 22, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Stronger binding to spatial relationships #114

SteveMacenski opened this issue Feb 22, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Owner

Take a ques from autonomous driving SLAM and maintain both a time-out and distance so that we don’t forget things nearby and out of frustum like their rolling SLAM implementations that only really track the local 100m window of road. Still some larger decay in the local area window of non-viewed items but higher. Similar to the frustum freezing work in another branch

@SteveMacenski SteveMacenski changed the title V2 Feature Stronger binding to spatial relationships May 28, 2019
@SteveMacenski
Copy link
Owner Author

v2 with a quasi-decay:

  • do ordinary raycasting, properly using the signed distance field optimizations
  • cache the measurements with the message. When time/distance are up, delete all measurements from a message rather than each individual cell
  • each cell needs a reference counter of callers so it only decays with all measurements are gone.
  • look at connected components in the multiresolution query to group together "substantial" blobs
  • further accelerate readings in mini-blobs or orphans

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant