Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to find an appropriate device to wire to #2821

Open
ebach23 opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Unable to find an appropriate device to wire to #2821

ebach23 opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
probeinterface Related to probeinterface question General question regarding SI

Comments

@ebach23
Copy link

ebach23 commented May 9, 2024

We recently switched from a Cambridge Neurotech 64 channel probe to a Cambridge Neurotech 16 channel probe that uses an omnetics adapter to connect to our Intan 16 channel headstage. We are trying to analyze a group of our data obtained with this set-up but are not able to wire to any of the devices that are listed as an option for these probes.
Our probes are: ASSY-1-P-2 - cambridgeneurotech - 16ch - 1shanks
The device options made available are:
['H32>RHD2132',
'ASSY-156>RHD2164',
'ASSY-116>RHD2132',
'ASSY-77>Adpt.A64-Om32_2x-sm-NN>RHD2164',
'ASSY-77>Adpt.A64-Om32_2x-sm-NN>two_RHD2132',
'cambridgeneurotech_mini-amp-64']

All of these appear to be 32 to channel or 64 channel which then read the error: "AssertionError: chan_indices 32 != contact count 16"
Can you help us identify how we can fix this problem?

@zm711 zm711 added question General question regarding SI probeinterface Related to probeinterface labels May 9, 2024
@zm711
Copy link
Collaborator

zm711 commented May 9, 2024

Hi @ebach23,

Looks like we don't have wiring to RHD2216 yet. I would open this issue on the probeinterface repo so that it can be put on the todo list over there. We have tools to allow you to do it manually if you want help with that and if you get that working then you can actually share the mapping with us and we can include it in probeinterface in the future.

@ebach23
Copy link
Author

ebach23 commented May 9, 2024

Thanks for your prompt response. I have posted this on the probeinterface repo, but may reach out to you about doing this manually. Is it best to reach you through this platform?

@zm711
Copy link
Collaborator

zm711 commented May 9, 2024

I'm fine with here. Technically it is better to have the issue on the repo directly so have the issue on probeinterface, but that repo gets checked a little bit less. So we can work on this one here and then in the future open probe issues there and spikesorting stuff here :)

@ebach23
Copy link
Author

ebach23 commented May 14, 2024

I got a response about this issue on the probe interface repo section, and gave them my reply. I havn't heard anything back. They had asked for the probe/adaptor map. Can you help me?

@zm711
Copy link
Collaborator

zm711 commented May 14, 2024

Yep we can try to work on it. We are actually prepping for a conference/hackathon in a couple days so we are a little slower with replying (apologies!)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
probeinterface Related to probeinterface question General question regarding SI
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants