Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

iterative linear solvers in the context of conservation laws #2139

Open
ChrisRackauckas opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

iterative linear solvers in the context of conservation laws #2139

ChrisRackauckas opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10543-023-00992-w

Q: Do iterative methods (in this case Newton) preserve nonlinear invariants? A: No. Q: What should one do about it? A: Relax the time step but leave the iterations alone.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-022-01923-7

Q: Do iterative methods preserve basic properties of PDE discretizations such as conservation? A: Some do, some don’t. Q: So if we pick a conservative one, then all is fine? A: No, because consistency is lost (time is slowed down).

https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/22M1503348

An extension of the previous paper. A bit harder to read but contains some new interesting results, not least on the connection between Krylov methods and pseudotime stepping.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pamm.202200157

A deeper dive into the inconsistency (time dilation) caused by Krylov methods. I wrote this paper in about 48 hours so it misses a crucial simplification in the main result that I can tell you about if you want to know more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant