You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just realized that Methods A-C don't have an embedded method. Does it still make sense to implement them?
And method D has an embedded method, but it took ~2000 steps to solve u' = 1.01u between (0,1)
After some changing btilde from [8/3, 1, 1, -1/3] to [0, 0, 0, 1] (originally to check for an potential error/bug), I got it down to 15 steps, but this change seems quite arbitrary. Besides from checking again for potential errors in the implementation, I am not sure how to proceed.
And ROS2 is also given in this paper and it has the same coefficients as in #2112 (and with this the same as in KPP), only the embedded methods is different from the one in KPP. I am thinking of implementing both and checking if both give reasonable solutions.
See Sandu (2000) Time stepping methods that favor positivity for atmospheric chemistry modeling. There are four methods
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: