You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am currently using "layered_halfspace" (from the examples folder of build) to perform benchmarking of the application. Is there a recommendation on which one is a popular suite to work with-for performance comparisons ?
Also for layered halfspace example, what are the validation variables we can use to check the validity of runs ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
you could benchmark it against the finite-difference code provided by CIG, that would be interesting: https://github.com/geodynamics/sw4
however, SW4 doesn't seem to handle acoustic-elastic coupling as in the layered halfspace example. you would probably need to make it fully (visco-)elastic.
validation:
in the example layered_halfspace, you can validate the results against another fully numerical implementation from Komatitsch & Tromp (1999) as provided in the subfolder therein.
if you want to validate against a semi-analytical solution, you could look at gar6more3D: https://gitlab.inria.fr/jdiaz/gar6more3d
which uses the Cagniard-de Hoop method to compute the solutions.
I am currently using "layered_halfspace" (from the examples folder of build) to perform benchmarking of the application. Is there a recommendation on which one is a popular suite to work with-for performance comparisons ?
Also for layered halfspace example, what are the validation variables we can use to check the validity of runs ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: