Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: Invisible.vbs not digitally signed #514

Closed
StreamCalm opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 16 comments
Closed

[Bug]: Invisible.vbs not digitally signed #514

StreamCalm opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 16 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale

Comments

@StreamCalm
Copy link

The problem

The invisible.vbs script isn't signed and so is blocked by AppLocker/WDAC policies requiring scripts to be signed (eg. error below from AppLocker).

Event 8007 %OSDRIVE%\PROGRAMDATA\WINGET-AUTOUPDATE\INVISIBLE.VBS was prevented from running.

Would be good to sign these like the powershell scripts to avoid hash based rules which will break with any changesi

What version of WAU has the issue?

1.04.0034

What version of Windows are you using (ex. Windows 11 22H2)?

Windows 11 23H2

What version of winget are you using?

1.6.3133

Log information

No response

Additional information

No response

@StreamCalm StreamCalm added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 7, 2023
@Romanitho
Copy link
Owner

#465
#496

@Romanitho Romanitho added good first issue Good for newcomers and removed bug Something isn't working labels Dec 7, 2023
@StreamCalm
Copy link
Author

Apologies, missed those! Thanks for coming back on it so quickly!

@Romanitho Romanitho added enhancement New feature or request and removed good first issue Good for newcomers labels Dec 7, 2023
@Romanitho
Copy link
Owner

Romanitho commented Dec 7, 2023

It is not really a bug, as it is working with standard config. It's related to your security level... but it's in the pipe :)

@StreamCalm
Copy link
Author

Thank you!

@AndrewDemski-ad-gmail-com
Copy link
Contributor

I do not want to be devils advocate here but you can trust file by hash.
Understanding the file hash rule condition in AppLocker
I wouldn't expect a community-developed project to waste money on signing a single file for little or no profit.

If you have AppLocker in your company, it means that it is managed. The mouse doesn't bite.
Going through the wizard to add a single file will take less time than writing in this thread.

@StreamCalm
Copy link
Author

Thanks Andrzej. All the powershell scripts are signed so I thought it might be an accidental oversight. Sounds like there are plans to work around it which is great to hear, and I’m very grateful to the devs.

Edit: Whoops, shouldn't reply to github comments with my email signatures on!

@AndrewDemski-ad-gmail-com
Copy link
Contributor

AndrewDemski-ad-gmail-com commented Dec 7, 2023

eh.. wrong issue..
entries moved to #465

@andreasbrett
Copy link
Contributor

All the powershell scripts are signed so I thought it might be an accidental oversight.

They're actually not signed.

@AndrewDemski-ad-gmail-com
Copy link
Contributor

Not by community, you would have to sign them by yourself or trust via AppLocker/WDAG rules.

@StreamCalm
Copy link
Author

StreamCalm commented Dec 11, 2023

They're actually not signed.

Thought I was going crazy for a second when I checked this morning - the one on my PC is signed, the one in the repo isn't!

I assume the Winget AutoUpdate Intune Store App is signing them (signing certificate matches that project's author).

Will raise it on that project, apologies for the confusion!

@Romanitho
Copy link
Owner

This project is a fork of our. And seams to be not maintained anymore. Still blocked on our 1.17 that contains security issue.

@StreamCalm
Copy link
Author

Thanks for letting me know!

@AndrewDemski-ad-gmail-com
Copy link
Contributor

@StreamCalm
Copy link
Author

Thanks Andrew, sage advice!

Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days since being marked as stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants