Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Provide distinct failure reasons for each built-in rule and provide option for specifying custom failure reasons #140

Open
NickEckert opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Provide distinct failure reasons for each built-in rule and provide option for specifying custom failure reasons #140

NickEckert opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@RohanNagar @NickEckert
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@NickEckert
Copy link
Collaborator

Enhance JMail's email validation by providing specific failure reasons for each built-in rule, rather than using a generic CUSTOM_RULE_FAILURE message for all rule violations.
@NickEckert NickEckert added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 10, 2023
@RohanNagar RohanNagar changed the title Improve JMail Validator: Distinct Failure Reasons for Each Built-In Rule Provide distinct failure reasons for each built-in rule May 17, 2023
@RohanNagar RohanNagar changed the title Provide distinct failure reasons for each built-in rule Provide distinct failure reasons for each built-in rule and provide option for specifying custom failure reasons Sep 1, 2023
@RohanNagar
Copy link
Owner

Since this feature would introduce a breaking change (although a small one), this change will be implemented in the next major version (version 2.0).

@RohanNagar RohanNagar mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2023
Open
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@RohanNagar RohanNagar

@NickEckert NickEckert

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@RohanNagar @NickEckert