Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Using RapidFuzz instead FuzzyWuzzy #60

Open
matalab opened this issue Jun 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Using RapidFuzz instead FuzzyWuzzy #60

matalab opened this issue Jun 30, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@matalab
Copy link

matalab commented Jun 30, 2021

Hello, if I am not wrong, fuzzymatcher is using FuzzyWuzzy?
If so, did you consider replacing it with RapidFuzz, which is claiming to provide same functionality, but being much faster?
See here: https://github.com/maxbachmann/RapidFuzz

Regards,
Zlatko
@emigre459
Copy link

Bump on this, we're also interested in submitting a PR to do the replacement (along with changing license to Apache v2, which is more permissive and RapidFuzz will allow) if that's of interest to the core maintainers?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@emigre459 @matalab