Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: rules support #91

Open
FFAMax opened this issue Apr 30, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

Feature request: rules support #91

FFAMax opened this issue Apr 30, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@FFAMax
Copy link

FFAMax commented Apr 30, 2023

Hi Team. What do you think about rules support?
I found significant benefit of using rules instead of dictionaries in cases of 8-9 symbols numbers.

  • This approach reduce overhead and allow to utilize GPU more efficiency (20-30%).
  • Less time on sync with a server (especially if server is busy). Just take 1 task and work on it the next hour(s).
  • Allow to reduce CPU utilization (in case of using slow or limited CPU).
@RealEnder
Copy link
Owner

Hi, thanks for the suggestion. Using rules is currently possible through co option, like this:
./help_crack.py -co="-r rules/best64.rule"

@FFAMax
Copy link
Author

FFAMax commented May 25, 2023

Could you please correct me if I'm wrong.
Seems like anyway [-ad ADDITIONAL | -cd CUSTOM] is required.
Therefore no options to verify uncracked handshakes with rule only.
Example: help_crack.py --coptions='-D 1 -a 3 ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d'
No hashes loaded.

@FFAMax
Copy link
Author

FFAMax commented May 25, 2023

Also I feel to clarify the goal.
The ideal case is to have list of uncracked hashes loaded to GPU with a simple rule (-a 3 ) applied [or advanced rules with -r <rules.file>]
This allow to efficiency continue work inside on GPU without interruptions on hash update or dict loadings (from server or toward GPU - both are decreasing efficiency as well as hashcat restart).

  1. Download hashes
  2. Init hashcat only once (hashes + rule | hashes + dict)
  3. Submit once complete

@denizalsancak
Copy link

denizalsancak commented Jul 11, 2023

Yes i am girl

@Backtix
Copy link

Backtix commented Jul 12, 2023

How about submitting it to RealEnder's site (wpa-sec.stanev.org) instead of hijacking the issue tracker?

Get a key and save it.
Submit your cap
Wait.
Profit.

@denizalsancak
Copy link

denizalsancak commented Jul 13, 2023

Ok

@denizalsancak
Copy link

i have 8192fu everest 689n wifi usb receiver. but it keeps disconnecting. university wireless no problem do you have any adapter suggestions for example tplink wn 7200nd or archer t4u 1300

@RealEnder
Copy link
Owner

This is more of hcxdumptool question. Most likely these adapters will work, depending on drivers used/kernel versions.
Just try them with latest hcxdumptool and submit any issues in its github tracker. More info on adapters here: https://github.com/ZerBea/hcxdumptool#adapters

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants