We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If a user joins during bot downtime or the bot cure bugs out, the only way to cure the username is by adding and removing a role.
Could you create a command to run the cure method on a user on demand?
The original method of curing those cases is annoying.
None.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
should this also use reply and respond_moderation? or is it unnecessary @oSumAtrIX
Sorry, something went wrong.
Can you elaborate?
Should running the cure command post an embed both replying to the user and in the logs channel?
A feedback should always be given to whoever runs the command, can be ephermal for example in this case. Logging should also be possible.
Ushie
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
π Issue
If a user joins during bot downtime or the bot cure bugs out, the only way to cure the username is by adding and removing a role.
β Solution
Could you create a command to run the cure method on a user on demand?
β Motivation
The original method of curing those cases is annoying.
β Additional context
None.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: