Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 2024.01 - RC2 #303

Closed
63 of 86 tasks
MrKevinWeiss opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 17 comments
Closed
63 of 86 tasks

Release 2024.01 - RC2 #303

MrKevinWeiss opened this issue Feb 6, 2024 · 17 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MrKevinWeiss
Copy link
Contributor

MrKevinWeiss commented Feb 6, 2024

This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2024.01 release.

Specs tested:

@riot-ci
Copy link

riot-ci commented Feb 6, 2024

Test Report

Task Outcome
01. Task 02 - Unittests on native PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-analog_util] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-base64] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-bcd] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-bhp_event] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-bhp_msg] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-bitfield] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-bloom] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-bluetil] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-checksum] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-chunked_ringbuffer] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-clif] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-coding] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-color] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-credman] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-div] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-dns_cache] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-ecc] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-fib] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-fib_sr] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-fmt] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-frac] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-gcoap] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-gnrc_ipv6] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-gnrc_ipv6_hdr] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-gnrc_ipv6_nib] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-gnrc_mac_internal] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-gnrc_netif_pktq] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-gnrc_sixlowpan_frag_vrb] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-gnrc_udp] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-hashes] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-ieee802154] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-inet_csum] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-ipv4_addr] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-ipv6_addr] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-ipv6_hdr] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-kernel_defines] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-libc] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-luid] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-matstat] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-mtd] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-nanocoap] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-nanocoap_cache] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-netopt] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-netreg] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-phydat] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-pkt] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-pktbuf] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-pktqueue] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-printf_float] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-priority_pktqueue] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-rtc] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-rtt_rtc] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-saul_reg] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-seq] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-sht1x] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-sixlowpan] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-sixlowpan_ctx] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-sixlowpan_sfr] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-sock_util] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-timex] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-tsrb] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-turo] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-uri_parser] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-ut_process] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-uuid] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-vfs] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-zptr] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-ztimer64] PASSED
01. Task 03 - Unittests on native separated [tests-ztimer] PASSED
01. Task 04 - Unittests on iotlab-m3 PASSED
03. Task 01 - ICMPv6 multicast echo on native PASSED
03. Task 02 - ICMPv6 link-local echo on native PASSED
03. Task 03 - ICMPv6 link-local echo on native (1 hour) PASSED
03. Task 04 - ICMPv6 stress test on native (1 hour) PASSED
03. Task 05 - ICMPv6 stress test on native (neighbor cache stress) PASSED
03. Task 06 - ICMPv6 link-local echo on native (IPv6 fragmentation) PASSED
04. Task 01 - ICMPv6 link-local echo with iotlab-m3 PASSED
04. Task 02 - ICMPv6 multicast echo with iotlab-m3/samr21-xpro PASSED
04. Task 03 - ICMPv6 echo with large payload PASSED
04. Task 04 - ICMPv6 echo with iotlab-m3/samr21-xpro 15 minutes PASSED
04. Task 05 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 multicast echo with iotlab-m3/cc2538 [strasbourg] PASSED
04. Task 06 (Experimental)- ICMPv6 link-local echo with iotlab-m3/cc2538 [strasbourg] PASSED
🟡 04. Task 07 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 multicast echo with samr21-xpro/zero + xbee SKIPPED
🟡 04. Task 08 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 echo with samr21-xpro/zero + xbee SKIPPED
04. Task 09 - ICMPv6 stress test on iotlab-m3 PASSED
04. Task 10 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 echo with large payload (IPv6 fragmentation) PASSED
04. Task 11 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 stress test on nrf802154 PASSED
04. Task 12 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 multicast echo with iotlab-m3/nrf802154 PASSED
04. Task 13 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 link-local echo with iotlab-m3/nrf802154 PASSED
05. Task 01 - ICMPv6 echo unicast addresess on native (default route) PASSED
05. Task 02 - ICMPv6 echo unicast addresess on iotlab-m3 (default route) PASSED
05. Task 03 - ICMPv6 echo unicast addresess on native (specific route) PASSED
05. Task 04 - ICMPv6 echo unicast addresess on iotlab-m3 (static route) PASSED
06. Task 01 - UDP on iotlab-m3 PASSED
06. Task 02 - UDP on iotlab-m3 (UDP port compression) PASSED
06. Task 03 - UDP on native (non-existent neighbor) PASSED
06. Task 04 - UDP on iotlab-m3 (non-existent neighbor) PASSED
06. Task 05 - Empty UDP on native PASSED
06. Task 06 - Empty UDP on iotlab-m3 PASSED
07. Task 01 - ICMPv6 echo on iotlab-m3 with three hops (static route) PASSED
07. Task 02 - UDP on iotlab-m3 with three hops (static route) PASSED
07. Task 03 - ICMPv6 echo on iotlab-m3 with three hops (RPL route) PASSED
07. Task 04 - UDP on iotlab-m3 with three hops (RPL route) PASSED
🟡 07. Task 05 (Experimental) - UDP with large payload on iotlab-m3 with three hops (RPL route) SKIPPED
08. Task 01 - ICMPv6 echo between native and Linux PASSED
08. Task 03 - ICMPv6 echo between RIOT and Contiki-NG FAILED
08. Task 08 - UDP between GNRC and lwIP on iotlab-m3 PASSED
09. Task 01 - CORD Endpoint PASSED
09. Task 02 - Confirmable retries [False-0] PASSED
09. Task 02 - Confirmable retries [True-1] PASSED
09. Task 03 - Block1 PASSED
09. Task 04 - Block2 PASSED
09. Task 05 - Observe registration and notification PASSED
10. Task 01 - Destination unreachable - no route to destination PASSED
10. Task 02 - Destination unreachable - Beyond scope of source address PASSED
10. Task 03 - Destination unreachable - address unreachable (target node address) PASSED
10. Task 04 - Destination unreachable - address unreachable (neighbor cache miss) PASSED
10. Task 05 - Destination unreachable - port unreachable PASSED
10. Task 06 - Destination unreachable - port unreachable (large payload) PASSED
10. Task 07 - Packet too big PASSED
10. Task 08 - Time exceeded - hop limit exceeded in transit PASSED
10. Task 09 - Parameter problem - erroneous header field encountered PASSED
10. Task 10 - IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation PASSED
11. Task 01 - LoRaWAN example PASSED
11. Task 02 - OTAA join procedure [0] PASSED
11. Task 02 - OTAA join procedure [3] PASSED
11. Task 02 - OTAA join procedure [5] PASSED
11. Task 03 - ABP join procedure [0] PASSED
11. Task 03 - ABP join procedure [3] PASSED
11. Task 03 - ABP join procedure [5] PASSED
11. Task 04 - LoRaWAN device parameters persistence PASSED
11. Task 05 - GNRC LoRaWAN (Over The Air Activation) [otaa] PASSED
🟡 11. Task 06 - GNRC LoRaWAN (ABP) [abp] SKIPPED

@jia200x
Copy link
Member

jia200x commented Feb 6, 2024

Test

Task #02 - ICMPv6 echo between iotlab-m3 and Linux with 6LowPAN: PASS

2024-02-06 12:00:36,584 # --- 2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb PING statistics ---
2024-02-06 12:00:36,589 # 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss
2024-02-06 12:00:36,594 # round-trip min/avg/max = 22.674/23.830/25.167 ms

@jia200x
Copy link
Member

jia200x commented Feb 6, 2024

Task #04 - ICMPv6 echo between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through Linux with 6LowPAN PASS

2024-02-06 12:05:09,602 # 12 bytes from 2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb: icmp_seq=75 ttl=63 rssi=-50 dBm time=21.955 ms
2024-02-06 12:05:10,604 # 12 bytes from 2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb: icmp_seq=76 ttl=63 rssi=-51 dBm time=22.703 ms
2024-02-06 12:05:11,608 # 12 bytes from 2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb: icmp_seq=77 ttl=63 rssi=-50 dBm time=24.617 ms
1	0.000000000	2001:db8::204:2519:1801:8930	2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb	ICMPv6	66	Echo (ping) request id=0xfd83, seq=15, hop limit=63 (reply in 2)
2	0.000046490	2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb	2001:db8::204:2519:1801:8930	ICMPv6	66	Echo (ping) reply id=0xfd83, seq=15, hop limit=64 (request in 1)

@MrKevinWeiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

MrKevinWeiss commented Feb 6, 2024

@jia200x
Copy link
Member

jia200x commented Feb 6, 2024

Task #06 - UDP between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through RIOT border router PASS

Task #07 - UDP between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through RIOT border router (200b payload) PASS

~/ sudo socat UDP6-LISTEN:80,fork,su=nobody - | xxd   
00000000: 1e1e 1e1e 1e1e 1e1e 1e1e 1f1f 1f1f 1f1f  ................
00000010: 1f1f 1f1f 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2121  ....          !!
00000020: 2121 2121 2121 2121 2222 2222 2222 2222  !!!!!!!!""""""""
00000030: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
00000040: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
00000050: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
00000060: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
00000070: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
00000080: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
00000090: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
000000a0: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
000000b0: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
000000c0: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
000000d0: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
000000e0: 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222  """"""""""""""""
udp send 2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb 80 10
> 2024-02-06 13:24:17,745 # udp send 2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb 80 10
2024-02-06 13:24:17,753 # Success: send 10 byte to [2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb]:80
> udp send 2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb 80 210
2024-02-06 13:24:24,150 # udp send 2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb 80 210
2024-02-06 13:24:24,170 # Success: send 210 byte to [2001:db8:1:0:204:2519:1801:bddb]:80

@MrKevinWeiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

Task #11 - UDP exchange between iotlab-m3 and Zephyr

iotlab-m3

ifconfig
2024-02-06 13:51:26,383 # ifconfig
2024-02-06 13:51:26,387 # Iface  5  HWaddr: 0D:74  Channel: 26  NID: 0x23  PHY: O-QPSK 
2024-02-06 13:51:26,388 #           
2024-02-06 13:51:26,390 #           Long HWaddr: A6:67:AF:41:D9:E4:8D:74 
2024-02-06 13:51:26,393 #            TX-Power: 0dBm  State: IDLE  max. Retrans.: 3  CSMA Retries: 4 
2024-02-06 13:51:26,395 #           AUTOACK  ACK_REQ  CSMA  L2-PDU:102  MTU:1280  HL:255  RTR  
2024-02-06 13:51:26,396 #           RTR_ADV  6LO  IPHC  
2024-02-06 13:51:26,396 #           Source address length: 8
2024-02-06 13:51:26,396 #           Link type: wireless
2024-02-06 13:51:26,397 #           inet6 addr: fe80::a467:af41:d9e4:8d74  scope: link  VAL
2024-02-06 13:51:26,398 #           inet6 addr: 2001:67c:254:b0c1:a467:af41:d9e4:8d74  scope: global  TNT[3]
2024-02-06 13:51:26,399 #           inet6 group: ff02::2
2024-02-06 13:51:26,399 #           inet6 group: ff02::1
2024-02-06 13:51:26,400 #           inet6 group: ff02::1:ffe4:8d74
2024-02-06 13:51:26,400 #           inet6 group: ff02::1a
2024-02-06 13:51:26,400 #           
2024-02-06 13:51:26,401 #           Statistics for Layer 2
2024-02-06 13:51:26,401 #             RX packets 4  bytes 307
2024-02-06 13:51:26,402 #             TX packets 5 (Multicast: 2)  bytes 360
2024-02-06 13:51:26,402 #             TX succeeded 5 errors 0
2024-02-06 13:51:26,409 #           Statistics for IPv6
2024-02-06 13:51:26,410 #             RX packets 4  bytes 320
2024-02-06 13:51:26,410 #             TX packets 5 (Multicast: 2)  bytes 402
2024-02-06 13:51:26,411 #             TX succeeded 5 errors 0
2024-02-06 13:51:26,411 # 
> ifconfig 5 set chan 26
2024-02-06 13:51:31,274 # ifconfig 5 set chan 26
2024-02-06 13:51:31,276 # success: set channel on interface 5 to 26
> ifconfig 5 set pan_id 0xabcd
2024-02-06 13:51:39,146 # ifconfig 5 set pan_id 0xabcd
2024-02-06 13:51:39,150 # success: set network identifier on interface 5 to 0xabcd
> udp server start 4242
2024-02-06 13:51:48,137 # udp server start 4242
2024-02-06 13:51:48,139 # Success: started UDP server on port 4242
> udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 "RIOT Testing!"
2024-02-06 13:52:59,620 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 "RIOT Testing!"
2024-02-06 13:52:59,621 # Error: unable to parse data_len
> udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 12
2024-02-06 13:53:14,723 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 12
2024-02-06 13:53:14,726 # Success: send 12 byte to [fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654]:4242
2024-02-06 13:53:14,737 # Packets received: 1
> udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:24,770 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:24,786 # Success: send 85 byte to [fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654]:4242
2024-02-06 13:53:24,787 # Packets received: 2
> udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:28,290 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:28,305 # Success: send 85 byte to [fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654]:4242
2024-02-06 13:53:28,306 # Packets received: 3
udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
> 2024-02-06 13:53:29,298 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:29,301 # Success: send 85 byte to [fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654]:4242
2024-02-06 13:53:29,312 # Packets received: 4
udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
> 2024-02-06 13:53:30,306 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:30,308 # Success: send 85 byte to [fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654]:4242
2024-02-06 13:53:30,320 # Packets received: 5
udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
> 2024-02-06 13:53:31,313 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:31,316 # Success: send 85 byte to [fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654]:4242
2024-02-06 13:53:31,316 # Packets received: 6
udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
> 2024-02-06 13:53:32,305 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:32,308 # Success: send 85 byte to [fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654]:4242
2024-02-06 13:53:32,320 # Packets received: 7
udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
> 2024-02-06 13:53:33,314 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:33,317 # Success: send 85 byte to [fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654]:4242
2024-02-06 13:53:33,328 # Packets received: 8
udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
> 2024-02-06 13:53:34,321 # udp send fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654 4242 85
2024-02-06 13:53:34,324 # Success: send 85 byte to [fe80::d870:14a4:758a:a654]:4242
2024-02-06 13:53:34,336 # Packets received: 9

samr21-xpro

uart:~$ D: (udp6): UDP (IPv6): Received and replied with 12 bytes
D: (udp6): UDP (IPv6): Received and replied with 85 bytes
D: (udp6): UDP (IPv6): Received and replied with 85 bytes
D: (udp6): UDP (IPv6): Received and replied with 85 bytes
D: (udp6): UDP (IPv6): Received and replied with 85 bytes
D: (udp6): UDP (IPv6): Received and replied with 85 bytes
D: (udp6): UDP (IPv6): Received and replied with 85 bytes
D: (udp6): UDP (IPv6): Received and replied with 85 bytes
D: (udp6): UDP (IPv6): Received and replied with 85 bytes
I: IPv6 UDP: Received 11 B/sec

@MrKevinWeiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will do the two ESP tests

If nothing else goes wrong then only:
Task #04 - ICMPv6 echo between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through Linux with 6LowPAN

and

Task #06 - GNRC LoRaWAN (ABP)

are left and we can release!

@jia200x
Copy link
Member

jia200x commented Feb 7, 2024

I will do the two ESP tests

If nothing else goes wrong then only:
[Task #4 - ICMPv6 echo between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through Linux with 6LowPAN]> > (https://github.com/RIOT-OS/Release-Specs/blob/0c23dbb567f79d415be96ec52c4ead4d4df48754/08-interop/README.md#task-04---icmpv6-echo-between-iotlab-m3-and-internet-host-through-linux-with-6lowpan)

and

Task #06 - GNRC LoRaWAN (ABP)

are left and we can release!

I'm on it!

@maribu
Copy link
Member

maribu commented Feb 7, 2024

So, ESP task 12:

> 2024-02-07 11:14:35,665 # WiFi connected to ssid Loeffelnetz, channel 1
ping riot-os.org
2024-02-07 11:14:43,123 # ping riot-os.org
2024-02-07 11:14:43,424 # 12 bytes from 2a01:4f9:1a:9508::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=45.077 ms
2024-02-07 11:14:44,422 # 12 bytes from 2a01:4f9:1a:9508::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.803 ms
2024-02-07 11:14:45,437 # 12 bytes from 2a01:4f9:1a:9508::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.548 ms

this works. I had to cheat a bit by adding UPLINK wifi password and additional USEMODULE to the Makefile instead of via command line, as this wasn't passed to the docker image with BUILD_IN_DOCKER=1. But I think this was broken before and is easy to work around, so let's not let this block the release.

@maribu
Copy link
Member

maribu commented Feb 7, 2024

Wait, the second interface doesn't get a global IP. I think my home network does do prefix delegation, at least my OpenWRT does claim to do that.

@jia200x
Copy link
Member

jia200x commented Feb 7, 2024

Task #06 - GNRC LoRaWAN (ABP) - PASSES*

I couldn't test downlink because Chirpstack is also replying with downlink frames in Port 0, which requests the node to change transmission settings and won't send additional data until it takes effect. So we cannot test this in ABP unless we implement the missing FOpts.

In any case, I wouldn't worry that much. The downlink feature is decoupled from the joining logic and it was already tested in the OTAA test.


  |  
-- | --
0 |  
type | "up"
payload |  
applicationID | "2"
applicationName | "ABP_dev"
deviceName | "abo"
devEUI | "b+vTS0jfJp4="
rxInfo |  
0 |  
gatewayID | "3KYy//4m/as="
time | "2024-02-07T10:49:55.760286Z"
timeSinceGPSEpoch | "1391338214.760s"
rssi | -41
loRaSNR | 8
channel | 2
rfChain | 1
board | 0
antenna | 0
location |  
latitude | 53.55595
longitude | 10.02491
altitude | 2
source | "UNKNOWN"
accuracy | 0
fineTimestampType | "NONE"
context | "rh6nrA=="
uplinkID | "+i/278hORIKnVz/ue7HV2g=="
crcStatus | "CRC_OK"
txInfo |  
frequency | 868500000
modulation | "LORA"
loRaModulationInfo |  
bandwidth | 125
spreadingFactor | 12
codeRate | "4/5"
polarizationInversion | false
adr | false
dr | 0
fCnt | 3
fPort | 1
data | "aG9sYQ=="
objectJSON | ""
tags | {}
confirmedUplink | false
devAddr | "APOM8A=="
publishedAt | "2024-02-07T10:48:01.988712229Z"
1 |  
type | "up"
payload |  
applicationID | "2"
applicationName | "ABP_dev"
deviceName | "abo"
devEUI | "b+vTS0jfJp4="
rxInfo |  
0 |  
gatewayID | "3KYy//4m/as="
time | "2024-02-07T10:50:30.153534Z"
timeSinceGPSEpoch | "1391338249.153s"
rssi | -41
loRaSNR | 7.8
channel | 2
rfChain | 1
board | 0
antenna | 0
location |  
latitude | 53.55595
longitude | 10.02491
altitude | 2
source | "UNKNOWN"
accuracy | 0
fineTimestampType | "NONE"
context | "rV5I9A=="
uplinkID | "62DrhsHaRraMeYo0tZqOwA=="
crcStatus | "CRC_OK"
txInfo |  
frequency | 868500000
modulation | "LORA"
loRaModulationInfo |  
bandwidth | 125
spreadingFactor | 12
codeRate | "4/5"
polarizationInversion | false
adr | false
dr | 0
fCnt | 2
fPort | 1
data | "aG9sYQ=="
objectJSON | ""
tags | {}
confirmedUplink | false
devAddr | "APOM8A=="
publishedAt | "2024-02-07T10:47:49.372349073Z"
2 |  
type | "up"
payload |  
applicationID | "2"
applicationName | "ABP_dev"
deviceName | "abo"
devEUI | "b+vTS0jfJp4="
rxInfo |  
0 |  
gatewayID | "3KYy//4m/as="
time | "2024-02-07T10:49:17.884510Z"
timeSinceGPSEpoch | "1391338176.884s"
rssi | -42
loRaSNR | 8.5
channel | 1
rfChain | 1
board | 0
antenna | 0
location |  
latitude | 53.55595
longitude | 10.02491
altitude | 2
source | "UNKNOWN"
accuracy | 0
fineTimestampType | "NONE"
context | "qzTdFA=="
uplinkID | "WhT3HUNQRnWfkHwxk9NWgQ=="
crcStatus | "CRC_OK"
txInfo |  
frequency | 868300000
modulation | "LORA"
loRaModulationInfo |  
bandwidth | 125
spreadingFactor | 12
codeRate | "4/5"
polarizationInversion | false
adr | false
dr | 0
fCnt | 1
fPort | 1
data | "aG9sYQ=="
objectJSON | ""
tags | {}
confirmedUplink | false
devAddr | "APOM8A=="
publishedAt | "2024-02-07T10:47:13.110266810Z"
3 |  
type | "up"
payload |  
applicationID | "2"
applicationName | "ABP_dev"
deviceName | "abo"
devEUI | "b+vTS0jfJp4="
rxInfo |  
0 |  
gatewayID | "3KYy//4m/as="
time | "2024-02-07T10:49:19.583570Z"
timeSinceGPSEpoch | "1391338178.583s"
rssi | -44
loRaSNR | 9
channel | 0
rfChain | 1
board | 0
antenna | 0
location |  
latitude | 53.55595
longitude | 10.02491
altitude | 2
source | "UNKNOWN"
accuracy | 0
fineTimestampType | "NONE"
context | "qXXBfA=="
uplinkID | "crJjdXDsTMqWEg0DKFJAHA=="
crcStatus | "CRC_OK"
txInfo |  
frequency | 868100000
modulation | "LORA"
loRaModulationInfo |  
bandwidth | 125
spreadingFactor | 12
codeRate | "4/5"
polarizationInversion | false
adr | false
dr | 0
fCnt | 0
fPort | 1
data | "aG9sYQ=="
objectJSON | ""
tags | {}
confirmedUplink | false
devAddr | "APOM8A=="
publishedAt | "2024-02-07T10:46:43.820248120Z"

@jia200x
Copy link
Member

jia200x commented Feb 7, 2024

Task #04 - ICMPv6 echo between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through Linux with 6LowPAN PASSES

2024-02-07 12:03:58,485 # ping 2002:67c:254:b0c2::1
2024-02-07 12:03:58,505 # 12 bytes from 2002:67c:254:b0c2::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 rssi=-70 dBm time=11.406 ms
2024-02-07 12:03:59,508 # 12 bytes from 2002:67c:254:b0c2::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 rssi=-70 dBm time=10.237 ms
2024-02-07 12:04:00,515 # 12 bytes from 2002:67c:254:b0c2::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 rssi=-70 dBm time=11.433 ms

@maribu
Copy link
Member

maribu commented Feb 7, 2024

I opened an issue regarding the failing ESP test: RIOT-OS/RIOT#20349

I think that the test would have worked if I didn't had a chain of two routers. My current setup is that I use a cheap FritzBox with a VDSL2 modem but no WiFi capabilities (802.11g and 2.4 GHz only IMO "no WiFi capabilities) and an OpenWrt box with WiFi behind that (802.11 ax dual-band). As a result the OpenWrt only has a smaller prefix to delegate. My guess is that RIOT's DHCPv6 is asking for a prefix longer than what the OpenWrt can or is willing to offer.

So no regression, but an issue that always has been there. Should IMO not block the release and is documented via the issue.

@MrKevinWeiss
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perfect... I think we can release as is and just backport RIOT-OS/RIOT#20348 to the release branch and it will be included with any point releases in the future.

@Teufelchen1
Copy link

Release is complete!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants