Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

required_linear_history not supported in branch protection #1551

Closed
rthill91 opened this issue Jun 4, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

required_linear_history not supported in branch protection #1551

rthill91 opened this issue Jun 4, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@rthill91
Copy link

rthill91 commented Jun 4, 2020

I don't see required_linear_history as an available option in edit_protection or elsewhere. Is there a specific reason for its absence or any timeline on when it might make it in?

The update protection GH docs for reference

@s-t-e-v-e-n-k
Copy link
Collaborator

Huh. I will note that parameter was not available when I wrote the branch protection code, which is why it's missing. I'll investigate adding it.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 8, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Aug 8, 2020
@gohelh-adsk
Copy link

This parameter was introduced in GitHub 2.20 (release notes) along with two other options as well, allow_force_pushes and allow_deletions. Support for all three would be great.

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Aug 11, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 11, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Oct 11, 2020
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Oct 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants