GitHub Actions support

[gschaffner]

Docs here: https://developer.github.com/v3/actions/

Are there plans to add support for GitHub Actions? The API is still in beta, but I would suspect that it won't change much in the future.

[parzhitsky]

Isn't Actions still in beta?

[gschaffner]

Looks like the beta ended in November [source]. The API is definitely still in beta though.

[sfdye]

https://developer.github.com/changes/2020-03-23-ActionsGA/

[sfdye]

Pin this issue to get more attention

[s-t-e-v-e-n-k]

I won't split this issue up into six, but documenting progress as I get to them.

• Artifacts
• Secrets
• Org secrets
• Self-hosted runners
• Workflows
• Workflow jobs
• Workflow runs

[cclauss]

#1456 and #1457

[marns93]

Are there any plans, when the Actions API will be supported?

[sfdye]

Not yet, but we are open to any granular PR to implement the checklist items ^

[s-t-e-v-e-n-k]

I have a local branch for Workflows, it requires some polish, tests and more importantly some free time.

[sfdye]

I can take Secrets when I have some time.

[3wnbr1]

Is somebody already working on Artifacts ? Otherwise I can take it

[sfdye]

@3wnbr1 Feel free

[s-t-e-v-e-n-k]

I have a local branch that needs some more love for Workflow Runs.

[JacekPliszka]

@3wnbr1 what is the status of your artifacts?

I have list of artifacts and downloading artifact working but I have no tests and also my implementation need modification.

[salomvary]

@s-t-e-v-e-n-k WorkflowRun seems to be missing workflow_id attribute: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/actions#list-workflow-runs-for-a-repository

[salomvary]

Another small thing: repo.get_workflow(id_or_name) fails if the id is int:

    "GET", self.url + "/actions/workflows/" + id_or_name
TypeError: can only concatenate str (not "int") to str

[zacker150]

I've added support for repo.get_workflow_runs parameters in PR #1682 and limited support for runners in #1684

[YannickJadoul]

@JacekPliszka & @3wnbr1 What's the status of the artifacts API? I'd be happy to help out, if there's something I can do to push this forward :-)

[JacekPliszka]

@YannickJadoul I've proposed some reduction of boilerplatte and I pushed it to my branch https://github.com/JacekPliszka/PyGithub/tree/meta_artifacts but discussion was slow and I got involved in other work and the project I need it for was put on hold.

So you may want to use something from my branch or write it in the current style anew.

[YannickJadoul]

@JacekPliszka, OK, great, thanks! :-) Where's this discussion you mention? Was that a public one, or just internally?

[plocket]

Are repo or org secrets being handled in here or elsewhere?

[calebstewart]

Is secret deletion on the road map? I see that creating/updating secrets is already added (and I think it was being tracked here from what I can tell), but I don't see any interface to the delete API (as seen here )

[JacekPliszka]

@YannickJadoul here #1556 - the project I needed that for was put on hold so I lost motivation for rewriting what I did

[YannickJadoul]

@JacekPliszka, thanks. I had actually found it, back then, and created #1734, recycling part of your original work on this.

[ghost]

not exactly a python developer, but it looks like org-scope and enterprise-scope self-hosted runner endpoints are missing too