You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following the discussion is #214 (comment), we may want to think about how to deal with the last element of the output. Currently, this is strictly zero, which makes some degree of sense, because a basic assumption of the Abel transform is that the intensity goes to zero at the last pixel. However, other transform methods (at least the hansenlaw) allow this pixel to have non-zero values. Potentially we could pad the array by an additional value (either zero, or the same as the last pixel) and then trim the final array.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Following the discussion is #214 (comment), we may want to think about how to deal with the last element of the output. Currently, this is strictly zero, which makes some degree of sense, because a basic assumption of the Abel transform is that the intensity goes to zero at the last pixel. However, other transform methods (at least the hansenlaw) allow this pixel to have non-zero values. Potentially we could pad the array by an additional value (either zero, or the same as the last pixel) and then trim the final array.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: