OpenRadioss,2D Fluid-structure blast #2554
Replies: 3 comments 6 replies
-
Hi, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @HNUbigbird, I confirm that type18 interface is not compatible with 2D analysis. You may build a 1-layer 3D model if you really want/need to use /INTER/TYPE18. The example shared by @wanglei742 is good to ilustrate this. You may try to use /INTER/TYPE1: ALE boundary nodes can be tied to Lagrangian surface to make fluid structure interaction. This way Lagrangian surface is acting as a sliding wall boundary condition. Depending on what kind of explosion simulation you want to do, you may also consider mapping. You do a first pure euler simulation in 2D and then you map the results in a 3D CEL model. This is what is described here: https://community.altair.com/community?id=altair_file_exchange_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0119695 Regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Oh, I think your bird is not big |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would like to use OpenRadioss for a fluid-structure interaction explosion analysis. The model is a 2D axisymmetric model, and the commonly used TYPE18 contact seems to only apply to three-dimensional problems. Which type of contact should I use to simulate fluid-structure interaction explosion?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions