Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No expert parks? #14

Open
Wuzzy2 opened this issue Jul 18, 2020 · 9 comments
Open

No expert parks? #14

Wuzzy2 opened this issue Jul 18, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@Wuzzy2
Copy link

Wuzzy2 commented Jul 18, 2020

Currently, no scenario is classified as Expert level. There is only Beginner and Intermediate and Other. Is this intended? Or are the expert parks still WIP?

I'm asking because I wonder if the lack of expert parks might be an oversight.

@Wuzzy2
Copy link
Author

Wuzzy2 commented Jul 18, 2020

I have not played the scenarios yet, so maybe (maybe!) I can give feedback about the perceived difficulty later.

@Gymnasiast
Copy link
Member

We are dependent on what kind of parks people send in. The lack of expert parks and real parks is certainly not intentional, it's just that no one has sent one in yet.

@Wuzzy2
Copy link
Author

Wuzzy2 commented Jul 18, 2020

OK, I was just wondering if the current classification is correct or not.

@Krutonium
Copy link
Member

Worth noting the obvious licensing issues with recreations of real parks - in that it's kinda super grey.

@Wuzzy2
Copy link
Author

Wuzzy2 commented Aug 30, 2020

It's not a grey area. If you didn't just blatanly copy a RCT park and maybe just changed a few tiles. It's much safer if you started building from scratch, and only took loose inspirations from RCT.

But IANAL.

@Krutonium
Copy link
Member

I mean like, you can't make a scenario called Canada's Wonderland and call it Canada's Wonderland, because that would be copyright infringing. Real parks is a category that'll be tricky.

@Gymnasiast
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure if that would be copyright infringing. After all, you're perfectly allowed to write books criticising companies, for example, even if you mentioned them explicitly in the title.

But if you want to stay on the safe side, you could create one called "Kenton's Dreamland" - Chris Sawyer did the same in RCT1. He made a park that was a recreation of Lightwater Valley and called it "Katie's Dreamland".

Or perhaps just asking the park directly: “Hey, I'd like to recreate your park in a game. Is it okay if I call it "Canada's Wonderland"?”

@IntelOrca
Copy link

Now I think there should be a scenario called "Kenton's Dreamland".

@Krutonium
Copy link
Member

Krutonium commented Sep 12, 2020

We're going to need Foxes and Extremely Large computer hardware. Lots of both.

Wonders if we could get computer companies to sponsor a computer hardware item set

On topic though, If you make a Park, try to make it accurate to an IRL park, Call it the same name without permission, that could lead to issues, imho, for the same reason that Bethesda sued Mojang over their game called "Scrolls".

(Elder Scrolls & Scrolls were both videogames).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants