Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not getting all matching results when searching #29

Open
2 of 4 tasks
abdouskamel opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 4 comments
Open
2 of 4 tasks

Not getting all matching results when searching #29

abdouskamel opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@abdouskamel
Copy link

abdouskamel commented Feb 1, 2018

Hello everybody,

I'd like to thank you for your work. I submit here my first issue in this repository.

I'm submitting a ...

  • bug report
  • feature request

Description:

I have tried to search for round robin in Cosmos search.

Expected Behavior:

All implementations of round robin in Cosmos.

Actual Behavior:

Getting just two implementations instead of three. Here are the implementations, the first one isn't appearing.

Steps to Reproduce:

  • Enter round robin in Cosmos search.

Would you like to work on this issue?

  • Yes
  • No
@sarvanideekshitula
Copy link
Contributor

The implementation which is not displayed isn't there in metadata.json file.

In json file it should be something like:
"operating_system/round_robin_scheduling": ["round_robin_c/round_robin.c", "round_robin_scheduling.cpp","round_robin_scheduling.java"]

In metadata.json it is like:
"operating_system/round_robin_scheduling":["round_robin_scheduling.cpp","round_robin_scheduling.java"]

I guess metadata.json has to be changed.

@AdiChat
Copy link
Member

AdiChat commented Feb 10, 2018

Yes, the metadata is expected to update automatically.

It looks like as the app goes to sleep after a period of inactivity, the update is failing.

@ankan17
Copy link
Contributor

ankan17 commented Feb 16, 2018

Actually correct metadata is not being generated due to the folder structure. See #54.

@anjalijaiswal08
Copy link

I would like to work on this issue .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants