Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OmniSharp Team and Roslyn Team convergence? :o #6

Open
david-driscoll opened this issue Dec 2, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

OmniSharp Team and Roslyn Team convergence? :o #6

david-driscoll opened this issue Dec 2, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@david-driscoll
Copy link
Member

C# / Roslyn / OmniSharp where is the ❤️?

  • Great discussion
  • The Roslyn team is looking at how they can take the code intelligence, currently in Visual Studio, and bring it out of process.
    • Is OmniSharp the answer to that?
    • Is the direction of the community inline with the direction of Microsoft?
    • Microsoft has concerns that if the have a deliverable to meet, could they still meet them while still shipping OmniSharp?
    • Can Microsoft pick and choose the features (ie plugins) that is opt in.
  • The answer was, the community basically wants to have a similar experience to OmniSharp, but in our editor of choice. And that we would love to use the same tool that Visual Studio itself is using.
  • [David D] My comment was that we shouldn't consider Microsoft as an outsider, but instead as a part of our community, and we're just one big team.

We might need some popcorn or this one, cc @OmniSharp/all 😄

@shmuelie
Copy link

shmuelie commented Dec 2, 2015

The big advantage of course is that then intellisense can improve out of sync with VS

@dmccaffery
Copy link
Member

Not to mention that Microsofts influence will allow the community to have a synchronized experience with language improvements and capabilities in step with Visual Studio.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants