You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Frank and Azdiar!
Thank you very much for answering my question. I recently calculated the double shear model of KS relationship. It is found that the shear mode of 24 variants has changed, and it is carried out along different double shear directions. Therefore, the orientation relationship between variants is not consistent with that defined by Morito et al., so I want to know how to redefine variants in ORtool and then draw them.
Morito:doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00577-3
Thanks!
wanghaijian
I believe you asked this question in an earlier discussion that was never replied to or closed.
The answer remains the same as the last 2 replies.
Please provide the script you have created.
In this way, we can analyse your outputs and find ways on how best to apply them within the ORTools framework.
PS - the place you're suggesting is not where any changes can be implemented.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi Frank and Azdiar!
Thank you very much for answering my question. I recently calculated the double shear model of KS relationship. It is found that the shear mode of 24 variants has changed, and it is carried out along different double shear directions. Therefore, the orientation relationship between variants is not consistent with that defined by Morito et al., so I want to know how to redefine variants in ORtool and then draw them.
Morito:doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00577-3
Thanks!
wanghaijian
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions