Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Descriptive Text for PROVIDER.SPECIALTY_SOURCE_VALUE #682

Closed
ericaVoss opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Descriptive Text for PROVIDER.SPECIALTY_SOURCE_VALUE #682

ericaVoss opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ericaVoss
Copy link

Descriptive Text for PROVIDER.SPECIALTY_SOURCE_VALUE

CDM or THEMIS convention?

CDM

Table or Field level?

Field

Is this a general convention?

One Field

Summary of issues

  • The text in the CDM documentation can be cleaned up a bit

Summary of answer

Improve the text here:
https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm53.html#provider

USER GUIDE ETL CONVENTIONS
ORIGINAL This is the kind of provider or specialty as it appears in the source data. This includes physician specialties such as internal medicine, emergency medicine, etc. and allied health professionals such as nurses, midwives, and pharmacists. Put the kind of provider as it appears in the source data. This field is up to the discretion of the ETL-er as to whether this should be the coded value from the source or the text description of the lookup value.
SUGGETION This refers to the specific type of healthcare provider or field of expertise listed in the source data, encompassing physician specialties like internal medicine, emergency medicine, etc., as well as allied health professionals such as nurses, midwives, and pharmacists. It covers medical specialties like surgery, internal medicine, and radiology, while other services like prosthetics, acupuncture, and physical therapy fall under the domain of "Service." The type of provider and their specialty should be entered as they appear in the source data. The decision to use either the coded value or the text description is left to the discretion of the ETL-er.

Related links

Other comments/notes

  • Don't necessarily see a THEMIS rule outside the one already captured
    Duplicate Providers? #161
  • I think the CDM documentation could be improved, will recommend a CDM doc change
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant