Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What to do when year_of_birth is missing from the source and cannot be derived #629

Closed
burrowse opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@burrowse
Copy link

burrowse commented Apr 1, 2024

What to do when year_of_birth is missing from the source and cannot be derived

CDM or THEMIS convention?

CDM

Is this a general convention?

Yes (in that it affects the overall population of records in the CDM)

Summary of issues

  • There may be cases in the source data where the year of birth is not explicitly available and cannot be derived from other sources such as age buckets or categorization.

Summary of answer

  • If no year of birth is available the person and accompanying data should be dropped from the CDM instance.
  • Reasons for removal of persons should be documented in the ETL documentation and METADATA table (insert row in METADATA where metadata.name='count of removed persons' and metada.value_as_string='xyz' where xyz is a number (e.g., 12)

Related links

@clairblacketer
Copy link
Contributor

Create a general convention page on the CDM about rules of person inclusion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants