You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're encountering an issue where the "old value" is always false; is that the intended logic here? It would seem it simply takes the key values from the vals dictionary and creates a dictionary where the values of each key is simply False, without populating them with the current values found on "self" prior to writing to the recordset.
It has the knock-on effect of rendering the logging of any field that is edited to be False as invisible, as the code sees the old and new value as the same (False), and thus doesn't add any line to the resulting log, only showing something was edited, but not what, nor to what.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@mads-vkd To me it also does not seem to be correct as the deletion of a value within a product field is not tracked properly. not sure if this issue goes into the same direction.
server-tools/auditlog/models/rule.py
Line 343 in 4384997
We're encountering an issue where the "old value" is always false; is that the intended logic here? It would seem it simply takes the key values from the vals dictionary and creates a dictionary where the values of each key is simply False, without populating them with the current values found on "self" prior to writing to the recordset.
It has the knock-on effect of rendering the logging of any field that is edited to be False as invisible, as the code sees the old and new value as the same (False), and thus doesn't add any line to the resulting log, only showing something was edited, but not what, nor to what.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: