Peer Feedback Data Project

[AndreaNoergaardAndersen]

1. The most elegant solution in the project was: (explain what and why)
   Creating maps was an elegant way of displaying your data.
2. The hardest section of code in the project to understand was: (explain what)
   All the code was easy to understand, but the analysis could be include more details. I.e. explanations for what each individual map shows and what it means. This could be drawn on to create a more complete conclusion. Some 'storytelling' is missing.
3. This part of the project could be better documented: (explain what)
   Comments on what the first plots show, the 'overview' could be written down.
4. An idea for an improvement/clarification could be: (explain what and why)
   More depth to why you chose that data, explanations for the variables, and why you chose those maps.
5. An idea for an extension could be: (explain what and why)
   Delete or fill out the 'your project title' section at the top. Also, the descriptive statistics is missing, which could be presented in a table.

In general, the code was clear and precise and easy to follow. The whole project could use more text, describing your train of thought for the analysis as well as taking the reader along for the ride - commenting on the results/plots.