You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When opening a package that doesn't specify meta.platforms, the message is simply "This package is not available on any platform."
This is somewhat misleading, for two reasons.
A user can try to build the package on any platform, even without setting NIXPKGS_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_SYSTEM=1
For x86_64-linux, the package will even be cached in hydra, so it's pretty much guaranteed to work.
My optimal solution for this would be to communicate both these caveats, maybe by showing x86_64-linux as a supported platform, with an additional disclaimer that the user can try installing the package on any other platform as well, but that it's not guaranteed to work.
Alternatively, the wording could be changed to "This package does not list any supported platforms.", or it might just show x86_64-linux as supported, nothing else.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When opening a package that doesn't specify
meta.platforms
, the message is simply "This package is not available on any platform."This is somewhat misleading, for two reasons.
NIXPKGS_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_SYSTEM=1
x86_64-linux
, the package will even be cached in hydra, so it's pretty much guaranteed to work.My optimal solution for this would be to communicate both these caveats, maybe by showing
x86_64-linux
as a supported platform, with an additional disclaimer that the user can try installing the package on any other platform as well, but that it's not guaranteed to work.Alternatively, the wording could be changed to "This package does not list any supported platforms.", or it might just show
x86_64-linux
as supported, nothing else.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: