Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Appstream file does not pass validation / desktop file improvement #438

Open
ignatenkobrain opened this issue Dec 19, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #439
Open

Appstream file does not pass validation / desktop file improvement #438

ignatenkobrain opened this issue Dec 19, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #439
Milestone

Comments

@ignatenkobrain
Copy link
Contributor

+ desktop-file-validate /home/brain/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nitrokey-app-1.4-1.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/applications/nitrokey-app.desktop
/home/brain/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nitrokey-app-1.4-1.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/applications/nitrokey-app.desktop: hint: value item "Security" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" can be extended with another category among the following categories: Settings, or System
+ appstream-util validate-relax --nonet /home/brain/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nitrokey-app-1.4-1.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/metainfo/com.nitrokey.nitrokey-app.appdata.xml
/home/brain/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/nitrokey-app-1.4-1.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/metainfo/com.nitrokey.nitrokey-app.appdata.xml: FAILED:
? tag-invalid           : <release> versions are not in order [1.3.2 before 1.4.0]

also the desktop file can be improved I guess :)

@szszszsz
Copy link
Member

szszszsz commented Jun 9, 2020

Reopening to keep note about the desktop file improvement

@szszszsz szszszsz reopened this Jun 9, 2020
@szszszsz szszszsz changed the title appstream file does not pass validation Appstream file does not pass validation / desktop file improvement Jun 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants