You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm using 3900x (12c24t), and using the default configuration will result in too many zram devices to be created and mounted, and the boot speed will be very slow.
If it makes sense to create multiple zram devices, you should consider multithreading to create and mount zram devices.
I now use the parameter zram_count=1, the situation is relieved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I also noticed zram_count being set to number of CPU cores unconditionally, which was the only way to parallelize access before the introduction of "multi stream functionality" with kernel 3.15.
Since kernel 4.7
Regardless of the value passed to [max_comp_streams], ZRAM will always
allocate multiple compression streams - one per online CPU - thus
allowing several concurrent compression operations.
I'm using 3900x (12c24t), and using the default configuration will result in too many zram devices to be created and mounted, and the boot speed will be very slow.
If it makes sense to create multiple zram devices, you should consider multithreading to create and mount zram devices.
I now use the parameter
zram_count=1
, the situation is relieved.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: