Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

When we would do a PathLink overhaul shouldn't PlaceRef be an abstract subsitution group for actual objects to be referred? #688

Open
skinkie opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

When we would do a PathLink overhaul shouldn't PlaceRef be an abstract subsitution group for actual objects to be referred? #688

skinkie opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@Aurige
Labels
enhancement non semantic enhacement: technical enhancement, etc.
Milestone
netex_2.0

Comments

@skinkie
Copy link
Contributor

skinkie commented Mar 21, 2024

No description provided.

@skinkie skinkie added the enhancement non semantic enhacement: technical enhancement, etc. label Mar 21, 2024
@ue71603 ue71603 added this to the netex_2.0 milestone Apr 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Aurige Aurige

Labels
enhancement non semantic enhacement: technical enhancement, etc.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
netex_2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@skinkie @nick-knowles @Aurige @ue71603